CELEBRITY
Princess Diana’s Driver Broke His Oath And Revealed the TRUTH About Diana’s Death: “It’s all up to you…” See more below
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46aad/46aad3bb10b875d007222147becc7247249aa927" alt=""
For more than two decades, the tragic death of Princess Diana in a Paris tunnel has been the subject of countless theories, speculation, and investigations. Now, in a shocking revelation, a former driver close to the princess has allegedly broken his silence, claiming that the real truth behind her fatal crash has never been fully disclosed to the public. His statements have reignited controversy and raised new questions about the circumstances surrounding her untimely passing.
Diana, known as the “People’s Princess,” died on August 31, 1997, when the Mercedes-Benz she was traveling in crashed in the Pont de l’Alma tunnel in Paris. Alongside her were her partner, Dodi Fayed, driver Henri Paul, and bodyguard Trevor Rees-Jones, the only survivor. Official investigations concluded that Paul, who was intoxicated at the time, lost control of the vehicle while attempting to evade paparazzi. However, conspiracy theories have long suggested foul play, with many believing Diana’s death was orchestrated.
The new revelation from the unnamed driver, who allegedly worked for Diana on multiple occasions, casts doubt on the official narrative. According to him, Diana had confided in him about her fears that she was being targeted. He claims she was convinced that powerful figures in the British establishment wanted her silenced due to her growing influence and controversial relationships. The driver insists that Diana’s concerns were not unfounded, citing past incidents where her car was mysteriously tampered with.
More disturbingly, the driver alleges that Henri Paul, the official driver on the night of the crash, was not acting alone. He suggests that Paul had been manipulated or coerced into taking a specific route that led them directly into danger. This claim aligns with theories that the crash was not merely an accident but a carefully orchestrated operation.
Additionally, the driver challenges the official toxicology reports that labeled Henri Paul as heavily intoxicated. He claims that Paul was in full control of his faculties and had not consumed excessive alcohol before taking the wheel. This assertion echoes previous disputes raised by forensic experts, who questioned the accuracy of the tests used to determine Paul’s blood alcohol levels.
The driver’s confession has reignited calls for a fresh investigation into Diana’s death. Supporters argue that the 2008 inquest, which ruled her death an “unlawful killing” due to the reckless actions of both paparazzi and her driver, failed to address deeper concerns. Mohamed Al-Fayed, Dodi’s father, has long maintained that Diana and his son were victims of a targeted assassination.
As the revelations spread, the British royal family has remained silent. The driver’s account, if proven credible, could further strain public trust in official explanations and add fuel to the enduring belief that Diana’s death was not merely an accident. While some remain skeptical, insisting that her death was a tragic result of misjudgment and high-speed driving, others see this testimony as a crucial piece of a larger puzzle that has remained unsolved for decades.